<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The month in&#8230; House/Techno</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: pollywog</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>pollywog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 15:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>distance, boxcutter, reso and  toasty (r.i.p)...nuff said !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>distance, boxcutter, reso and  toasty (r.i.p)&#8230;nuff said !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: midnightstepper</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>midnightstepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>That should be, remember when Richie Hawtin was good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should be, remember when Richie Hawtin was good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KFDM</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-12649</link>
		<dc:creator>KFDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-12649</guid>
		<description>and why bother write about a chosen topic if at the very start of the piece you are casting doubts on it by calling it &#039;tenuous&#039;? It makes it look like the author himself doesn&#039;t even buy into the basis for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and why bother write about a chosen topic if at the very start of the piece you are casting doubts on it by calling it &#8216;tenuous&#8217;? It makes it look like the author himself doesn&#8217;t even buy into the basis for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KMDM</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>KMDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-751</guid>
		<description>where does it say tenuous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where does it say tenuous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob flemming</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-12648</link>
		<dc:creator>bob flemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-12648</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Month in House/Techno: T++, Shed and the tenuous return of the breakbeat&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Month in House/Techno: T++, Shed and the tenuous return of the breakbeat&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Flemming</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Flemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-735</guid>
		<description>hence the &#039;tenuous&#039; in the title?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hence the &#39;tenuous&#39; in the title?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KFDM</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>KFDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-734</guid>
		<description>yeah maybe so, but it still doesn&#039;t take away from the fact that the central  point of this column, that break beats are &#039;back&#039; in techno is flawed. as i already said, breakbeats in techno have been hugely popular for the past  10 years across Europe - just because they weren&#039;t popular in ultra-trendy berlin doesn;t mean that they weren&#039;t big news elsewhere. the article reeks of a music journo trying to &#039;create&#039; or &#039;find&#039; a narrative when it has already been around for over a decade....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah maybe so, but it still doesn&#39;t take away from the fact that the central  point of this column, that break beats are &#39;back&#39; in techno is flawed. as i already said, breakbeats in techno have been hugely popular for the past  10 years across Europe &#8211; just because they weren&#39;t popular in ultra-trendy berlin doesn;t mean that they weren&#39;t big news elsewhere. the article reeks of a music journo trying to &#39;create&#39; or &#39;find&#39; a narrative when it has already been around for over a decade&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob flemming</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>bob flemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-722</guid>
		<description>one of the last colummns on house and techno was all about the sandwell/downwards axis, maybe the writer didn&#039;t want to tread the same ground? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.factmag.com/2009/11/01/the-month-in-house-techno-3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.factmag.com/2009/11/01/the-month-in-...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the last colummns on house and techno was all about the sandwell/downwards axis, maybe the writer didn&#39;t want to tread the same ground? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.factmag.com/2009/11/01/the-month-in-house-techno-3/" rel="nofollow">http://www.factmag.com/2009/11/01/the-month-in-&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KFDM</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>KFDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-709</guid>
		<description>Mmm, not so sure about the basis or indeed the accuracy for this article. break beat techno has been hugely popular in parts of Europe for the past 10 years and Surgeon and Regis etc have been doing breakbeat techno for ages too. Even if you want to reduce the focus to Berlin producers - as the article seems to have allready done, then maybe you should have mentioned that loads of the sandwell stuff, esp kalon, is breakbeat heavy. pity that you went for  the trendy yet inaccurate angle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm, not so sure about the basis or indeed the accuracy for this article. break beat techno has been hugely popular in parts of Europe for the past 10 years and Surgeon and Regis etc have been doing breakbeat techno for ages too. Even if you want to reduce the focus to Berlin producers &#8211; as the article seems to have allready done, then maybe you should have mentioned that loads of the sandwell stuff, esp kalon, is breakbeat heavy. pity that you went for  the trendy yet inaccurate angle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinsdollan</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/02/12/the-month-in-housetechno/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinsdollan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=8573#comment-697</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s true. for too long the breakbet has been the preserve of the gurn-out masses. time to reclaim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#39;s true. for too long the breakbet has been the preserve of the gurn-out masses. time to reclaim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

