<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matthew Herbert hits back at PETA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.factmag.com/2010/03/04/matthew-herbert-vs-peta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/03/04/matthew-herbert-vs-peta/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Digophelia1</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/03/04/matthew-herbert-vs-peta/comment-page-1/#comment-25700</link>
		<dc:creator>Digophelia1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=10210#comment-25700</guid>
		<description>Thing
is... regardless of their celebrity statuses, neither PETA nor Herbert
will get anywhere without the rational discourse of argument when it
comes to animal ethics. It is well-documented that PETA uses and kills
animals who have been &quot;rescued&quot; and uses sexism in adverts to &quot;attract
everybody&quot;. Attracting everybody has not, thus far, worked to
obliterate animal suffering / use. The fact that Matthew Herbert thinks
that using animal sounds from a pig though it was going to &quot;die anyway&quot;
says that he also thinks very little about the suffering or use of
animals. That he produced a track made from pig sounds are not a wrong
in itself, but that he partook in the death of that pig and endorses it
IS a wrong in itself. Because the pig &quot;ran free-range&quot; is equivelant to
a slave having a whole house to live and die in rather than one 4x4
room. Does that justify it? The conclusion is that Herbert and PETA are just as fallacious as each other!
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thing<br />
is&#8230; regardless of their celebrity statuses, neither PETA nor Herbert<br />
will get anywhere without the rational discourse of argument when it<br />
comes to animal ethics. It is well-documented that PETA uses and kills<br />
animals who have been &#8220;rescued&#8221; and uses sexism in adverts to &#8220;attract<br />
everybody&#8221;. Attracting everybody has not, thus far, worked to<br />
obliterate animal suffering / use. The fact that Matthew Herbert thinks<br />
that using animal sounds from a pig though it was going to &#8220;die anyway&#8221;<br />
says that he also thinks very little about the suffering or use of<br />
animals. That he produced a track made from pig sounds are not a wrong<br />
in itself, but that he partook in the death of that pig and endorses it<br />
IS a wrong in itself. Because the pig &#8220;ran free-range&#8221; is equivelant to<br />
a slave having a whole house to live and die in rather than one 4&#215;4<br />
room. Does that justify it? The conclusion is that Herbert and PETA are just as fallacious as each other!<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video premiere: The Matthew Herbert Big Band live &#124; FACT magazine: music and art</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/03/04/matthew-herbert-vs-peta/comment-page-1/#comment-3459</link>
		<dc:creator>Video premiere: The Matthew Herbert Big Band live &#124; FACT magazine: music and art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 09:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=10210#comment-3459</guid>
		<description>[...] This month, Matthew Herbert released One One, the latest twist in a musical career that has featured deep house, ruthless experimentation and, er, pig slaughter. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This month, Matthew Herbert released One One, the latest twist in a musical career that has featured deep house, ruthless experimentation and, er, pig slaughter. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremyirons</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/03/04/matthew-herbert-vs-peta/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremyirons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=10210#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Is this a joke?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a joke?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leighdennis</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/03/04/matthew-herbert-vs-peta/comment-page-1/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>leighdennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=10210#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>very good, I hope PETA have been given something to think about here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good, I hope PETA have been given something to think about here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fritz</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2010/03/04/matthew-herbert-vs-peta/comment-page-1/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=10210#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>I am a veggie myself, I must say PETA are a bunch of veggie talebans who give us all a bad name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a veggie myself, I must say PETA are a bunch of veggie talebans who give us all a bad name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

