James Blake: James Blake

Available on: ATLAS LP

It’s a good thing James Blake wrote this album when he was still at university, because I’ll be surprised if there’s another time in his life where he seems under more pressure to make a great record.

Before continuing, maybe we should take a step back. James Blake is 22 or 23. He’s been releasing music for approximately a year and a half, the majority of which has been very good. His debut album has been promoted everywhere, from the front page of the Guardian Guide to posters on the London Underground, and this appears to have prompted a lot of music fans to either expect a masterpiece, or join an increasingly notable backlash. Both are unfair reactions.

One of the main reasons it’s unfair to expect some sort of grand statement, or masterpiece, is because since the start of 2010, James Blake’s music has been notably modest. You have to turn ‘Buzzard and Kestrel’ up to hear the track’s catchiest melody. His most triumphant dancefloor track in this period, and one of the few Blake songs with instantly intelligible lyrics, ‘CMYK’, speaks through Aaliyah and Kelis. And in keeping with that, James Blake the album is a modest first long-player. It’s full of sadness, with some genuinely incredible songwriting moments, but you need to concentrate to hear them. It’s unimposing.

And at times, its shyness can be its downfall. Far more crucial to this record than sub-bass or use of space (it’s funny how the latter has become a total buzz-phrase of late; you’d think the xx invented silence) is Blake’s knack for fantastic melodies, and understanding of where to take a song; I can’t think of a single way, for instance, that ‘The Wilhelm Scream’ could be structured better. Every note is spot-on. So it’s frustrating, if endearing, that as the record develops, Blake increasingly feels the need to break up some of its strongest melodies with glitches and pauses. It’s like constantly apologising for a great wedding speech – it’s not necessarily what you want to hear, but by its very nature it’s hard to condemn modesty.

Moreso than Blake’s singles to date, his album works best when you shut off. Shut off the noises of the outside world, shut off the part of your brain that picks up on the occasional lyric or track title that’s a little too bare, and shut off the fact you might well be sick of seeing his face everywhere – it’s not Blake’s fault that every other publication going decided to cover him last month, and it’s a true shame that none of them felt the need to cover much new ground, and explore where his music comes from in the same way that Louis Patterson’s Quietus review often does. It’s isolationist headphone music, at times serene, at times exposed, and unlike say, ‘CMYK’, I can’t think of many public situations where it would even seem appropriate.

There are moments where this album drifts, and if you’d have taken the six best tracks and made it an EP, then it would’ve been the best thing Blake’s released. But that’s almost missing the point – Blake would likely admit, given how long ago he wrote it, that it’s far from perfect. It’s a collection of songs, from just one period in the development of modern music’s most unique artists, and taken as another part of the slowly unravelling puzzle that is his discography, as opposed to The Grand Debut Album that so many want it to be, it’s pretty priceless. Like much of James Blake’s music, it’s too modest to demand your attention, but it more than warrants it.

Tom Lea

  • http://twitter.com/goalexiis Sasha Tsereteli

    I don’t understand why people keep pretending that the album hasn’t leaked 2 months ago. Why does everyone keep talking about “previews” of the album and start discussing it just now? Respect to the artist?

  • openthelight

    Really great review. My thoughts exactly re: modesty. Also got the sense of modesty from the Mount Kimbie LP which I had generated really high expectations for and was at first a little disappointed by but then entirely charmed. Well done FACT for having a sense of perspective!

  • Tom Lea

    I don’t think anyone’s pretending the album hasn’t leaked yet, but out of respect to the artist and the label that are funding the release, it’s our opinion that you shouldn’t review something until it’s out.

    Pre-release reviews encourage leaking, if anything.

  • openthelight

    Congrats for having bit torrent..

  • Cantona

    I saw a line somewhere ages ago that made me smile, something like: “After 7th February, we will say there was the music before James Blake’s album, and now there is the music after James Blake’s album.”

    No album can possibly live up to that kind of (tongue in cheek) hype, and thankfully, this one isn’t trying to. I’m sure James Blake has a hard drive or two full of less understated, ‘bigger’ tracks, but that’s not what this album’s about. At all.

    It’s way more subtle than that, and all the better for it.

  • http://twitter.com/goalexiis Sasha Tsereteli

    Thanks, that’s exactly the answer I’ve been expecting, nothing more, nothing less.

  • Jon

    Sounds like an Anthony & The Johnsons LP, don’t find it very listenable tbh, few solid all rounds tracks, but on the whole didn’t really connect with it, especially not lyrically.

  • http://twitter.com/IsoRadiator Isotropic Radiator

    “Blake would likely admit, given how long ago he wrote it, that it’s far from perfect”
    FUCKING EXACTLY!!!! He has actually stated that in interviews. Context matters. People are trying to listen this album as if it was written after Klavierwerke. It was not, and is way more raw than all his EPs. Its a great album, not a perfect one.

  • hrrr

    Can’t wait to hear this vocoder stink in the Gap. Shit sucks. Maybe you can explain the importance of context when you’re plunking down the same amount of cash for this crap. At least everyone got to preview their disappointment.

  • Angus

    This is a very good, very fair review. well done

  • Kikischoe

    interesting remix of limit to your love http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-DXoxjZU9o … dubstep gone… best I ve heared so far

  • Jackberryman

    Yeah, excellent review. About time somebody wrote something remotely intelligent about this inspirational guy.

  • trumpo

    you guys might like this dude, bon iver

    *chortle* *chortle*

  • Asda

    No, this is a much more incisive review of the James Blake album than FACT’s quisling nonsense

    http://thequietus.com/articles/05632-james-blake-review

  • godzilla.

    I love FACTs inconsistencies. I remember a certain Gold Panda review last year where the actual quality of the music was ignored and the LP ripped to pieces because of perceived ‘hype’. Yet with this album they’re bending over backwards to give it a decent review score, even though they admit it’s got loads of problems. But then I guess James Blake is so hot right now…James Blake!

  • Joker dee

    FACT isn’t one person who listens to everything and reviews everything – it’s lots of different writers, and naturally they approach stuff from different angles. get a grip.

  • http://loudersoft.com loudersoft

    This is far and away the best review of that album I’ve read. Thank you for being clear and forthright about it instead of, as many others have been, “OMG GREATEST ALBUM IN HISTORY WORLD CHANGED OH GOD I NEVER HAVE TO DO LAUNDRY AGAIN”. It’s not a good album, but it is an album with some good songs.

  • http://loudersoft.com loudersoft

    Correction: it’s not a *great* album, but it is an album with some very good songs. I fear that the 9.0 BNM review from Pitchfork will make it nearly impossible for James to ever make anything nearly this simple again.

Advertisement