Comments on: Azealia Banks: 1991

By: Ted

Ted — Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:23:00 +0000

Jesus, how is that last paragraph hard to understand? Yes, some sentences can be simplified to get the point more direct, but it is a very spot-on review which talks both about the strengths and weaknesses of an album, something I’d like to read when looking for an album.

The second half of “Van Vogue” is utterly utterly stupid. And yeah, way too Missy Elliott on “1991″ even though it doesn’t come close to those mentioned Missy tracks.

By: Keelinglucy

Keelinglucy — Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:19:00 +0000

god people on here are so up their own arses. If you can write better, go out and do it and stop boring me

By: KT

KT — Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:51:00 +0000

another FACT piece about Banks, another piece that treats her Twitter beefs like they’re something you are powerless to avoid. “unfollow.” problem solved.

By: whatever

whatever — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 22:12:00 +0000

machinedrum is to azealia banks
what clams casino is to asap rocky

and that last paragraph is cumbersome

By: Stephen Schmunk

Stephen Schmunk — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:22:00 +0000

-Need some additional punctuation in the “switches from rapping to singing less for hooks to sugar the hardness of her rapping.” You need to sugar the hardness of comprehension for the reader!

-Instead of “denseness” you could just say “density.”

-Tired of hearing about this broad.

By: Angus

Angus — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 19:26:00 +0000

“[...] but once Banks’ clever double-backing references (one verse starts with Louvre and ends up at Lou(is) to the V(uitton))”

ah yes truly we are dealing with a great mind

By: bigAL

bigAL — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:08:00 +0000

extremely intelligent, i’m ashamed to say i didn’t have a clue what that last paragraph meant

By: p4k mom

p4k mom — Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:57:00 +0000

intelligent review.