<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nathan Fake: Steam Days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.factmag.com/2012/08/16/nathan-fake-steam-days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.factmag.com/2012/08/16/nathan-fake-steam-days/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 05:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Bon Jabroni</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2012/08/16/nathan-fake-steam-days/comment-page-1/#comment-46816</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bon Jabroni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=97733#comment-46816</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. I feel, though, that if the score system is so arbitrary and vague, essentially giving more credence to a particular record over another, then perhaps it shouldn&#039;t be used at all. By way of imagination, production value, sense of melody, etc, the Fake record is (I know, subjectivity...blah, blah, blah) the better record and so numbering it so that it&#039;s considered equal to albums reviewed previously with a similar or higher score is a bit misguided. I don&#039;t mean to slag the Convex release off completely (it&#039;s a decent techno release). Just trying to make the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. I feel, though, that if the score system is so arbitrary and vague, essentially giving more credence to a particular record over another, then perhaps it shouldn&#8217;t be used at all. By way of imagination, production value, sense of melody, etc, the Fake record is (I know, subjectivity&#8230;blah, blah, blah) the better record and so numbering it so that it&#8217;s considered equal to albums reviewed previously with a similar or higher score is a bit misguided. I don&#8217;t mean to slag the Convex release off completely (it&#8217;s a decent techno release). Just trying to make the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2012/08/16/nathan-fake-steam-days/comment-page-1/#comment-46785</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=97733#comment-46785</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re different contributors, mind. Possibly taking different ideas into consideration. Maybe I wrote the Convex one with existing fans in mind a little much. Scores are vague anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re different contributors, mind. Possibly taking different ideas into consideration. Maybe I wrote the Convex one with existing fans in mind a little much. Scores are vague anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Bon Jabroni</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2012/08/16/nathan-fake-steam-days/comment-page-1/#comment-46784</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Bon Jabroni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=97733#comment-46784</guid>
		<description>Same rating as the Convex rec, which is completely predictable and exhaustively boring?  Hmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same rating as the Convex rec, which is completely predictable and exhaustively boring?  Hmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cambo</title>
		<link>http://www.factmag.com/2012/08/16/nathan-fake-steam-days/comment-page-1/#comment-46770</link>
		<dc:creator>Cambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.factmag.com/?p=97733#comment-46770</guid>
		<description>word, cool and succinct review. iceni strings is great, the 1-2 punch of world of spectrum and rue is fantastic. reminds of iradelphic but more technoey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>word, cool and succinct review. iceni strings is great, the 1-2 punch of world of spectrum and rue is fantastic. reminds of iradelphic but more technoey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
