Cassette playa: in praise of tapes

Introduced in 1963 by Phillips, the ‘Compact Cassette’ was created as a convenient means of recording the spoken voice (interviews, memos, for use in the court-room). The format became a runaway success when Phillips decided to license it for free. Audiophiles may have considered it a runt compared to vinyl, but by the 80s cassettes were outselling vinyl LPs. Furthermore, by the end of that decade engineers and manufacturers had worked out how to wring every last bit magic from the format. Japanese manufacturer Nakamichi led the pack in this respect by abandoning the Prague EQ format for proportioning the weight of the sound curve to magnetic tape and came up with a series of machines which managed to exceed the sound quality of the then nascent CD, as well as packing the full warmth and depth of analogue audio.


Nakamichi’s machines managed to exceed the sound quality of the then nascent CD



Nakamichi are most famous for machines like The Dragon (the only tape deck to make Stereophile magazine’s ‘Top 100 Audio Artefacts Ever’ list) and the almost hilariously over-engineered RX-505 – which flipped the cassette itself rather than chance misaligned heads in the standard auto-reverse procedure. The RX-505 can be seen starring alongside Mickey Rourke and Kim Basinger in 9 1/2 Weeks. However, aficionados confidently pronounce that the truly great “Naks” are the less flashy CR-7E and ZX-9 decks which concentrated on nailing playback and recording and ignoring superfluity. Nakamichis are wonderful machines but perhaps not such a sensible purchase today. Second-hand models can be serviced by speaker manufacturer Bowers and Wilkins in the UK, but remain notoriously difficult to maintain in peak condition, often the victims of mechanical failure. Furthermore, their eccentric approach to the sonic spectrum means that while no other tape may sound as good as one recorded on a Nak, on another manufacturer’s machine it won’t perform equally well. Such was the cost for tearing up the rulebook.

Other leading lights were the firms Revox and Tandberg. Switzerland’s Studer Revox spooned their huge mechanical knowledge and expertise gleaned from being at the forefront of open-reel ‘Reel-to-Reel’ manufacture (they created legendary machines like the A77) into magnificent decks like the B710 and the B215. The Revox decks are built like proverbial tanks to Swiss standards. Norwegian firm Tandberg are famous for their 3014A and, should you wish to chance your luck and find a second-hand cassette deck, the Tascam 122′s are also excellent and hard-wearing. Buyers of this calibre of machine often remark at the wondrousness of being able to acquire the greatest object of its kind for only a few hundred dollars, not the sort of thing that is readily achievable these days.


The cassette was massive in Africa where it survived the rigours of the climate infinitely better than vinyl



While the hardcore of tape aesthetes despair of declining manufacturing standards, through the 90s there were still a raft of good decks being made, albeit none which really match the quality of these aforementioned classic decks. Sony’s 3-headed ES range were excellently engineered and Pioneer continued to spend money on research and development long into the last decade, routinely turning out machines like the CT-W806DR which were pimped with high-end features like individual capstan motors and their Flex system, an intelligently crafted response to Dolby’s NX technology. The CD certainly didn’t kill cassettes, a fact which is underscored by the format’s continued (and perhaps only just beginning to wane) importance in the second and third world. The cassette was massive in Africa where it survived the rigours of the climate infinitely better than vinyl, the same climate that has probably stymied CDs’ growth. For a brief window if you wanted to buy some of the now depleted resource of Metal Audio cassettes, one of the last remaining manufacturers were Turkey’s Raks.

I didn’t mention that stocks of cassettes were low? There are three types of audio cassettes: Ferric, Chrome and Metal each with a broader dynamic range making them a successively livelier listen. The only remaining Chrome tapes available for purchase in the UK are TDK’s SA series; not bad, but nothing on Extended Chrome offerings like the now deleted Fuju Zii or TDK’s SA-X series. As for Metals, sealed ones can be found online eked out by unscrupulous dealers for up to thirty pounds each. The prize trophy must go to TDK’s quite exquisite MA-XG series that come in clear steel-framed enclosures like mini reel-to-reel. But equally, if you come upon a stash of Sony Metal Master or Fuji Metal Z, don’t snooze. It’s probably also worth mentioning that there are advocates for the lowly ferric too, for instance people who insist they respond in their own particular way to acoustic music, and renegade ‘Position Normal’ formats like TDK’s AR-X which gain praise for their sumptuous mid-range responsiveness.


When you make a cassette you don’t just choose 90 minutes of music, you actually have to sit through that selection.



A lot has been written about the form of the mixtape in the past,  from essays by Geoffrey O’Brien who described it as “the most widely-practised American art-form” to extended tracts in Nick Hornby’s High Fidelity to Thurston Moore’s 2004 book The Art Of Cassette Culture, which showcased the lovingly crafted artwork that accompanied these symphonies of love. However, for our purposes it will simply serve to reflect that in the headlong rush towards the convenience of the digital format we have forgotten the rituals that ensured that a homespun collection of music was something to be cherished.

When you make a cassette you don’t just choose 90 minutes of music, you actually have to sit through that selection. You enjoy the process of crafting something you want to listen to again. There is no comparison here with iTunes where tracks are dropped blindly into a play-list. The same level of engagement extends to listening to these wretched play-lists. We skip and shuffle restlessly through them. It is paradoxical that the iPod and the CD Recorder (infuriatingly counter-intuitive when compared to the ease of recording with a tape deck) are in fact often burdened with their own illogic. There’s nothing particularly convenient about having a million tracks at your fingertips, when all you want is the equivalent of two C90s, your latest mix and your most recent purchase.



Matt ‘Woebot’ Ingram
tapedeck.org

Next page (3/3)


Pages: 1 2 3

  • manshortage

    Give me a .wav any day. Does anyone remember being mortified while you're pulling jammed tape from your walkman. And how they deteriorate play by play? My uncompressed wavs will sound as good they did on the day of rip/purchase when I'm in my 70s.

  • PaulMD
  • Michael

    you're kidding me right? Quality of tape was *terrible*, nobody real had any of those high end tape players, must of us struggled with low quality walkmen… no, IPod quality is infinitely better. Just make sure you sample high enough, that's all…

    … and nothing wrong with maintaining the old tape discipline: get the whole album (not just the 'hit' song/track), listen to albums in sequence, listen to the whole album, build strong/considered playlists…

  • D'Artagnan Pluck

    Agreed on all counts. Sound quality is not just the clarity and noiselessness of the sound, it has many factors. mp3 encoding is based upon the perceptual experience, and makes assumptions on what the listener would hear if it was actually hearing it live. Analog recordings are far superior, and it should be noted, is not subject to bit rot like the digital formats. If I put a record on the shelf, I can still play it in 50 years. A file can quite easily get lost just by buying a new mp3 device, and tossing the old.

  • Sanitymuffin

    great feature! if your looking for fantastic music and artisticly packaged jewels to stuff into your decks try Oaklands Sanity Muffin tape label!
    http://www.sanitymuffins.blogspot.com

  • Markboulton_london

    Hear Hear!! Analogue formats retain subtle harmonics which the bias frequencies of the various tape types were carefully selected to complement. Conversely, the sampling rates and compression ratios of physical digital and non-physical digital formats 'gate out' those very same subtle harmonics that make music *music* rather than sound. At its best, a well-encoded mp3 is simply a very complex synthesizer's “cover version” of the sound, whereas an analogue format is the only one that can give you the real sound. Analogue is the “Original Artist”… every time! BTW You would like my own site, soundhog.moonfruit.com!

  • alexander m.

    I think it's more about nostalgia for the physical object, than any possible case for the sound quality (which was derrrr-eadful in most scenarios). We're now surrounded by music, can hear tracks before the labels that have “paid” for them have even given them the nod, and music has become a kind of knowledge-sport rather than a slow burning of excitement surprise and enjoyment. How many bands are sort of all buzzed out in the 10 months between first Yuksek remix appearance on a blog and actual “album out” status is achieved. Maybe we need a slow-music movement – which cassettes would be perfect for – batteries on a walkman amounted to about 4-5 album repeats before going back down the shops. Plus you can only carry about 10 before it gets to a luggage issue…

    But the sound quality was pants, particularly once they'd been through your parents' car cassette player – or 96kbps stereo as we know it now – all swooshy hi-hats and gargling vocals…

  • alexander m.

    “Giving up my iPod for a week” (BBC)
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8117619.stm

  • CEDUPZ

    Crank up Victrola is also making a comeback! this is all absolute BS, nonsense.

  • Brian

    That’s absolutely ridiculous. Digital audio has much higher resolution then analog audio including cassettes. It has nothing to do with Bias and gated out? Do you even know what you’re talking about? Actually those subtle harmonics are lost on tape because the signal to noise ratio is atrocious, looking at 60 db dynamic range as the best of the best whereas the noise floor is so low on a compact disc that the air sound in a studio is actually louder. The average cassette player will has poor frequency response too, 15hz-15khz. If you spend a tonne of money you can get it up to cd standards but you’ve still got to worry about wow and the afforementioned dynamic range issues. I’ve heard a lot of people make the case for tapes because they’re cheaper (incorrect), have a nice tactile feel (nothing to do with music), force you to listen to the whole album (ADD, not anything to do with music) but to try and make a case that an audio format even worse sounding then vinyl beats digital audio is just silly.

  • Brian

    Also, forgot to rebut your statement about digital audio being a synthesizer and analogue being real sound. First of all, by definition it is an 'analog' of the original sound. It's not the original sound. Digital audio information is quantized but it still constructs an analogue signal coming out of your speakers because obviously our ears are analog. You can use simplified, shallow analogies but if it is just the synthesizers interpretation, it's an interpretation far more detailed then the analog formats interpretation (note, still an interpretation).

  • Pingback: An Example | Das Kleine Field Recordings Festival

  • Pingback: Tales for Tapes in Berlin (again) | Rinus van Alebeek

  • Tapetronic

    and now this is TAPETRONIC !!!

    http://www.alexismalbert.com/

  • Alexskinnertosh123456

    Check out :http://soundcloud.com/pussy-foot
    this guy uses all tapes to make throw back dance music. pretty great and strangly nostalgic

  • Patrik

    Analogue is a lot of work to make sound good. But it easily beats CD, not to mention mp3 which sounds awful in comparison (it sounds unoffensive but not not in a realistic and engaging way). I’m recording an LP by Pretenders onto tape as I type this (onto a Tandberg 3014). Portable playback is with a Sony WM-DC6 which kicks ass and drives real headphones properly. To make the digital revolution even worse producers/mixers have compressed all life out of the music in the “loudness war”.. Awful! (Note: I have done it all: CD, mp3, FLAC, Squeezebox, SACD, DVD Audio.)

Advertisement